
Grab the prompt
Check the box above to enable all copy buttons in these tabs.
Copy this prompt and paste it into any AI — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Codex, Cursor, Clawdbot, whatever you use. When your context window gets heavy, paste this prompt, let it generate the handoff document, then clear your context and paste the resume prompt into your fresh conversation.
See that optional field below? If you already know what the next session should tackle, type it there — it gets baked into the prompt you copy, and the next AI treats it as its first task. Leave it blank and the copied prompt tells the next AI to size up the project, propose the smartest next move, and wait for your go-ahead. Either way, you never have to edit the prompt by hand. You get control when you want it, autonomy when you don't.
Leave it blank and the copied prompt tells the next AI to propose the best next step and wait for your go-ahead.
↑ Check the checkbox above to activate
Most people try to create handoff documents, and almost everyone does it wrong. Telling your AI to “capture everything” produces a bloated summary that buries what matters. Tracking “all the micro tasks” treats every fact as equally important — and in a real project, it isn’t. What you did in the last thirty minutes matters ten times more than what you did three hours ago, and the reasoning behind a decision matters more than a list of what you built. Without structure and priority you don’t get continuity; you get noise. This prompt gives the AI the structure.
Never run a prompt you haven’t read. Paste it into your agent first and ask whether it contains any instruction to run shell commands, touch files outside the project, or reach the network. This one doesn’t — it only writes a document — but a clean prompt gets a clean answer, and the habit is worth more than the prompt.
Why it works when summaries fail
Recency-weighted. What you did in the last 30 minutes matters more than what you did 3 hours ago, and the document is built in that order.
It keeps the why. Decisions are recorded with their reasoning and tradeoffs, which is what stops the next AI from quietly undoing them.
An explicit Do Not Touch list. The new session is told what not to refactor, rename, or redesign.
Confidence flags on every section. High, medium, or low — the next AI knows what to trust and what to double-check.
Verify before trust. The resume prompt makes the next AI run git status and git log against the document and flag any drift before it works.
A directive for what happens next. Tell the next session exactly what to do first, or leave it blank and let it propose the most strategic next step and wait.
How to use it
What you did in the last thirty minutes matters ten times more than what you did three hours ago. The prompt is built around that.
The document the AI writes has eight sections, each aimed at a specific way continuations fail: Project Identity (objective, intent, hard constraints, memory files) · What Exists Right Now (branch, latest commit, whether it builds, what is working, partial, broken, or not started) · Architecture & Technical Map (stack, key files, end-to-end flow, the exact commands) · Recent Work, the highest-priority section (what changed, what was decided and why, lessons worth promoting to CLAUDE.md) · What Could Go Wrong · How to Think About This Project · the Do Not Touch list · and Confidence & Freshness flags for all of the above.
Questions
This prompt is versioned. The changelog below tracks every release, and copying from this page records which version you took — so when a notable release lands, this page can tell you.
